Monday’s medical misconception: it is possible to get a grip on the sex of one’s infant

Monday’s medical misconception: it is possible to get a grip on the sex of one’s infant

Associate Principal Investigator, Telethon Institute for Child Wellness Analysis, University of Western Australia

Disclosure statement

Monique Robinson receives funding through the nationwide health insurance and Medical analysis Council (NHMRC).

University of Western Australia provides money as a founding partner regarding the discussion AU.

The discussion UK gets funding from all of these organisations

  • E-mail
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Messenger

Despite many parents ultimately just wishing for a healthy and balanced infant, there are numerous cultural and social facets that may drive the wish to have a child of the sex that is particular.

The medical technology for intercourse collection of embryos has existed in Australia for quite some time, but such a choice is just designed for medical reasons, such as sex-linked chromosomal condition.

This leaves parents who do have sex choice to locate normal methods of predetermining the intercourse of these child.

The idea that timing sex around ovulation can tip the odds in favour of a girl or a boy was popularised by Shettles and Rorvik in the best-selling book How to Choose the Sex of Your Baby in the 1960s.

Alongside taking into consideration the pH status of this reproductive tract, Shettles’ idea ended up being that Y semen (resulting in male infants) swim faster than X semen (resulting in feminine children), consequently if intercourse is timed close to ovulation they are going to get to the egg first.

However, Y sperm reside fast and die young. The y sperm die off before they reach the egg, maximising the chances for X sperm to achieve fertilisation if sex occurs a number of days before ovulation. Continue reading Monday’s medical misconception: it is possible to get a grip on the sex of one’s infant