Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That is why some anti-gambling activists there have actually created a petition in order to force a statewide vote on whether or not the casino tasks is able to move forward.
Those who are against the brand new casinos were able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But unfortunately for them, the state solicitor however a stop to the move, saying that the ballot question would not be legal beneath the state’s ballot initiative process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
The ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48 under the current state Constitution. That article not just describes the process for getting a relevant concern in the ballot, but also establishes exactly what can and may not be included in such questions. One of the guidelines for proposals claims that they cannot hinder an entity’s ‘right to get settlement for personal property appropriated to public use’.
According to state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the question were to be approved by the public, thus ending the casino deals immediately, it could simply take the casino developers’ contract rights away with no settlement. Continue reading Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG