Submit manuscript:Please read the guidelines for writers

Submit manuscript:Please read the guidelines for writers

The main concern of Tobacco Control is offer a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which can be prone to further the objectives of a comprehensive tobacco control policy. The introduction should indicate why the research reported or issues discussed are important in terms of controlling tobacco use, and the discussion section should include an analysis of how the research reported contributes to tobacco control objectives in papers submitted for review.

Documents firmly anchored to a policy that is strategic programme context are more inclined to be accepted for book. Whilst the log seeks to attain a readership that is international writers must look into whether their intended submissions target dilemmas or themes, that are apt to be of great interest to researchers employed in other countries. Extremely parochial problems, that incorporate few classes for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are not likely to be provided with high concern. The manuscripts editors will generally speaking maybe not provide priority that is high:

  • Studies of smoking cigarettes prevalence as well as its correlates. They are most suitable to nationwide journals. Few individuals residing outside a national nation want in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette cigarette cigarette smokers.
  • Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific populace teams or medical researchers. Once more, they are better suited to national journals or even wellness speciality that is professional. Few individuals far away will tend to be enthusiastic about (for instance) whether nurses in a local medical center are thinking about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and the ones using studies that are such initial areas are of more interest.
  • Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are documents with findings that appear to hold no apparent value for changing policy or training in tobacco control. They frequently show methodological finery, but take us anywhere don’t essential or interesting.
  • Advice pieces where in fact the views are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or disregard for essential issues that are ethical favor of sloganeering. Continue reading Submit manuscript:Please read the guidelines for writers